KTLK Talk Spot

Welcome to KTLK Talk Spot Sign in | Join | Help
in
Back to KTLKFM.com Home Forums

Dopey Senate at it again.

Last post 08-06-2008, 6:23 PM by ob_one. 3 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  07-14-2008, 7:17 PM 3203166

    Dopey Senate at it again.

    Typical, I like the comments about "drill, drill, drill" my Markey. What an absolute idiot and public face for the libs... The land that the government leased the oil companies for the most part is non-productive land. It's been explored and found to not have enough reserves to justify oil drilling, not "exploration" were there is a huge difference. These libs truly are deceitful morons. Apparently they think "poking a hole in the ground" to see if there's any oil is a cheap endevour. I've been there, and trust e, it's not cheap. Most of the area leased literally is un-accessable, and what can be accessed most of the equipment has to be either helo'ed in or gasp, a road cut through pristine wilderness, where some mouse or owl may get screwed, so the environmentalist' file a lawsuit. I keep saying over and over folks, we a screwing ourselves. I guess the shining light is if the Messiah is elected, he'll screw this country up so bad that there won't be a moritorium on anything.

     

    Senate Rejects Bush Ban on Offshore Drilling

    Monday, July 14, 2008

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, on Monday rejected a call by President George W. Bush to lift a moratorium on offshore oil drilling.

    Bush announced on Monday that he lifted the executive branch's restriction on offshore exploration, saying only Congress stood in the way of opening up America's untapped oil riches.

    But Reid said oil companies should focus instead on drilling on much of the 68 million acres that they have leased but not used for exploration. (thanks for the screw job Harry. The issue is anyone with common sense (which is going in the toilet in this country) knows you're nothing but a bag of hot Nevada desert air)

    Asked, however, if he expected to have the votes to block legislation to lift the moratorium in face of soaring gasoline prices, Reid told a news conferences, "We will have to wait and see." (Translation: give me time to run around and extort and threaten the Senators who favor drilling, then I'll give you an answer. Hey Harry, go back to Nevada, retire, and sit in front of the nickle slots. Hopefully your constituents will force you to do this).

    Reid said he hoped to have legislation introduced this week to crack down on oil speculators. (all speculators Harry??? That would be every commodity traded worldwide that passes through our trading houses. Gee I'd love to see gold back at say, $25 an ounce, or corn at $.50 a bushel)

    On the other side of the Capitol, Rep. Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, mocked Bush's call earlier in the day to lift the ban.

    "The Bush oil policy is an attempt at mass deception by a White House that has, for the last seven and a half years, pursued Big Oil's agenda of drill, drill, drill," Markey, chairman of a select House of Representatives committee on energy independence, told a news conference. (total garbage, speak fact instead of spewing waste water, clown)

    "Drill, drill, drill has failed, failed, failed," Markey said. "It has failed to make America energy independent. It has failed to prevent rising prices at the pump." (what an absolute total 100% moron, and his constituents buy this bag of garbage???)

    Note to President Bush. Go out and call these idiots on this. 67% of the American people now favor opening up restricted areas to drilling. Put the final nail in the coffin on these dopes.


    Buy American made products, ESPECIALLY beer.

    It's our money, not the government's.

    Ignorance of the facts is no excuse. Educate yourself before you embarrass yourself.
  •  08-06-2008, 8:38 AM 3275043 in reply to 3203166

    Re: Dopey Senate at it again.

    I heard this morning that Bush does not have the courage (his marble bag is empty) to call the Demoncrats back to special session.  If Bush had any inkling of how important this is to the people of this country he would stop his nice, nice attitude and grow a back bone and force these congress people back to work so we get an energy plan!

    If he had the guts he would openly call out Reid and say something like, Geeze Harry, congress has an approval rating of what 9%?  My approval rating was 30+% the last time I checked, do you really think the American people like you better than they like me?

    BUT NO....we have Bush the wimp in office, just like his father.  I just hope and pray that McCain has more of a spine when he wins in November.


    A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.
  •  08-06-2008, 9:05 AM 3275156 in reply to 3203166

    Re: Dopey Senate at it again.

    ob_one:

    Typical, I like the comments about "drill, drill, drill" my Markey. What an absolute idiot and public face for the libs... The land that the government leased the oil companies for the most part is non-productive land. It's been explored and found to not have enough reserves to justify oil drilling, not "exploration" were there is a huge difference. These libs truly are deceitful morons. Apparently they think "poking a hole in the ground" to see if there's any oil is a cheap endevour. I've been there, and trust e, it's not cheap. Most of the area leased literally is un-accessable, and what can be accessed most of the equipment has to be either helo'ed in or gasp, a road cut through pristine wilderness, where some mouse or owl may get screwed, so the environmentalist' file a lawsuit. I keep saying over and over folks, we a screwing ourselves. I guess the shining light is if the Messiah is elected, he'll screw this country up so bad that there won't be a moritorium on anything.

     

    Just a couple questions ob_one (or anybody who has the answers) just because I am curious about how companies make business decisions.

    1)  If most of the areas leased are inaccessible, why did the oil companies spend millions of dollars to lease them?

    2)  If the oil companies have explored the accessible areas and found that they are unproductive, shouldn't they let the leases expire instead of paying millions of dollars to hold onto the leases?


    Public Education - The bureaucratic process of replacing an empty mind with a closed one.
  •  08-06-2008, 6:23 PM 3277513 in reply to 3275156

    Re: Dopey Senate at it again.

    GunBoatRider:
    ob_one:

    Typical, I like the comments about "drill, drill, drill" my Markey. What an absolute idiot and public face for the libs... The land that the government leased the oil companies for the most part is non-productive land. It's been explored and found to not have enough reserves to justify oil drilling, not "exploration" were there is a huge difference. These libs truly are deceitful morons. Apparently they think "poking a hole in the ground" to see if there's any oil is a cheap endevour. I've been there, and trust e, it's not cheap. Most of the area leased literally is un-accessable, and what can be accessed most of the equipment has to be either helo'ed in or gasp, a road cut through pristine wilderness, where some mouse or owl may get screwed, so the environmentalist' file a lawsuit. I keep saying over and over folks, we a screwing ourselves. I guess the shining light is if the Messiah is elected, he'll screw this country up so bad that there won't be a moritorium on anything.

     

    Just a couple questions ob_one (or anybody who has the answers) just because I am curious about how companies make business decisions.

    1)  If most of the areas leased are inaccessible, why did the oil companies spend millions of dollars to lease them?

    2)  If the oil companies have explored the accessible areas and found that they are unproductive, shouldn't they let the leases expire instead of paying millions of dollars to hold onto the leases?

    Hey GBR,

    1) Most of the land was leased years ago when the gvmt and enviro's were trying to put everything off limits, so it was pretty much grab what you can get that looks promising. As I stated above, most of it is in-accessible except for helo-ing in the equipment or cutting new roads, or waiting until winter in the case of areas in Alaska where the tundra will freeze and accessiblity will open. Then the issue is getting the product out. Another reason they weren't explored when the leases were cut was sub-terrain exploration was in it's infancy and oil was $30bbl. which made it cost prohibitive.

    2) Good question on the latter. The companies have declared them as un-productive, but years ago. When they were questioned on why they hadn't explored, they cited older tests, some done over a decade earlier. Where the words twist and what you don't hear is "could they be productive now? In the future? Eventually the areas they do hold leases in may pay, just depends on where the price of oil goes. Plus, they're not allowed to lease anything that does look promising, sooo???? Oil companies sadly are the current pariah. Remember big pharm? That group just could'nt win. Develop the next miracle drug, up front costs of 2B. (yes, billion) but that never goes reported. Just the price of the drug, which the company has to recoup before the patent expires. Just watch what happend when the patents on Viagra and Cialis expire. Everyone will have the ability for a 10 cent hard-on...


    Buy American made products, ESPECIALLY beer.

    It's our money, not the government's.

    Ignorance of the facts is no excuse. Educate yourself before you embarrass yourself.
View as RSS news feed in XML
Inergize Digital Media This site powered by Inergize Digital Media. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of this station.